Is a PHR in your EHR Future?

Jan. 3, 2012
Patient portals have long been accepted as opportunities for physicians to interact with patients.

Patient portals have long been accepted as opportunities for physicians to interact with patients, solve communication issues by providing a secure conduit for clinicians and even allowing patients to pay their bills on-line. The later is used as the ROI for purchasing such systems. But it falls short of collecting medications, clinical history, glucometer results and other personal clinical monitoring systems. So what about all these separate Personal Health Records PHR’s? Microsoft, WEBMD and others provide PHR’s that provide a means for patients to store information. I recently subscribed to the Walgreen’s PHR to help manage my medications and then found myself inputting personal health information. The rationale is that the more they know about your health, the less likely the medications will adversely affect conditions not being treated by your primary health provider. It also allows me to receive refill information and other subscription related information. The value for me was the service I was already receiving by using their pharmacy. I logged into the Microsoft PHR and found myself wondering what value was I getting out of this? Before I created my PHR at Walgreens, they already knew what medications I was on, what insurance I had and how many last minute hallmark anniversary cards I had purchased. Microsoft knows how many times an application has crashed on my PC every time I submit a bug report.

Some PHR’s like Google Health allows you to link to other PHR’s or EHR’s like , Cleveland Clinic, Longs Drugs, Medco, CVS, Quest, RxAmerica and Walgreens. The list of Medical Centers is very short. So why are we not embracing these PHR’s within Health Information Systems? Integration would enable chronic disease patients to better provide continuous information to their health systems and other patients can provide up to date demographic and history information. However, there is little discussion on data exchange with these PHR’s. Patient Kiosks focus on demographics and financial information because we want to get paid. What about clinical information? Are there liability issues that preclude patients from entering information into their records? Shouldn’t we have a bi-directional exchange of physician appointments, lab, meds and the full continuum of care? Until we are ready to truly empower our patients with their clinical information, we will not have a full past and present picture of their health.

Sponsored Recommendations

Admit it, your EHR can’t do everything: Strategies for efficiency and better consumer experiences

Discover strategies to overcome EHR limitations and boost efficiency in your practice. Join industry leaders as they explore how a unified care enablement model can streamline...

Driving top quality performance through data-driven actionable insights.

Join us to explore how data-driven insights are transforming healthcare. Learn how leveraging big data and analytics can enhance patient care, optimize workflows, and drive top...

CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule: What no one is thinking about but should be

Join our panel as we explore the overlooked challenges of the CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule. Discover key implications for payers and providers, and ...

The Race to Replace POTS Lines: Keeping Your People and Facilities Safe

Don't wait until it's too late—join our webinar to learn how healthcare organizations are racing to replace obsolete POTS lines, ensuring compliance, reducing liability, and maintaining...