The COVID-19 epidemic continues to impact health systems in a variety of ways, with revenue loss being one of the issues hospitals are becoming increasingly concerned with. In a recent study, researchers found that without raising the reimbursement premium on COVID-19 patient cases, the worst-case scenario will result in 97 percent of health systems losing an average of $2,800 per case, with many losing between $8,000 and $10,000 per case.
The latest analysis comes from data scientists from Strata Decision Technology used a proxy group of related COVID-19 patient cases to model the effect on a representative sample of health systems across the U.S.
Researchers also modeled the results of the proposed 20 percent increase in Medicare reimbursement for COVID-19 cases contained within the Republican stimulus bill currently under consideration in Congress. Even with this increase, the analysis shows there will be an average loss of about $1,200 per case and up to $6,000 to $8,000 per case for some hospital systems, depending on their payer mix.
Strata reviewed research from Italy, China and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) before selecting a proxy patient group to simulate the characteristics of COVID-19 patients. Patients were selected from 32 U.S. health systems representing 127 hospitals with 1.2 million combined annual discharges (2019) and $45 billion in annual operational expenses—a subset of the company’s data-sharing network and platform.
Patients selected for the proxy group were those who matched the eight DRGs reflecting similar conditions and complications to COVID-19, including pneumonia, respiratory infections, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, and ECMO life support. The cost and payment metrics for these cases were adjusted based on the observed severity of COVID-19, including a 25 percent addition to total costs.
To model the financial impact, researchers assumed that the 32 institutions would operate at 110 percent of normal capacity to handle the surge and treat 225,000 COVID-19 patients over the course of 30 days.
While COVID-19 cases tend to skew toward Medicare patients (65 years and older), researchers used mean reimbursement across all payer types for each institution studied, including commercial insurance. As a result, the model may actually underestimate the magnitude of negative margin from these cases.
The data scientists revealed that costs for COVID-19 patients are significantly higher even than their proxy DRG counterparts. This is because the complexity of the patients is causing a decline in nurse staffing ratios as nurses and staff are required to help each other validate that their personal protective equipment (PPE) is properly fitted. Costs are also higher due to expanded cleaning regimens, PPE shortages, more frequent X-rays and CT scans, and overall higher supply and drug costs. Overall, it takes longer and requires more to care for these patients than even the proxy DRGs selected, according to the analysis.
What’s more, alongside the higher cost of treatment for COVID-19 patients, the model included projected revenue and margin lost from elective inpatient services deferred as hospitals make room for more COVID-19 patients. Elective cases are the primary source of revenue for many hospitals, allowing them to take a loss on certain other services while remaining profitable, the analysts noted. Researchers estimate that 90 percent of hospitals that cancel all elective procedures will shortly begin to experience negative profit margins from COVID-19 cases.
Providers made many of these concerns known last week when they wrote a letter to Congressional leaders, dated March 19 and signed by the CEOs of the American Hospital Association (AHA), American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Nurses Association (ANA), stating that due to the expenses to treat COVID-19 cases, hospitals are losing up to $1 million per day. As such, the organizations have asked Congress for $100 billion in funding so that they’ll be able to take the necessary steps to fight the battle against the coronavirus epidemic.
In the end, the researchers concluded that many hospitals will not be able to survive the damage to their cash flow for longer than 60 to 90 days. “Without additional financial relief from government or other sources, they will be forced to take decisive action to reduce costs such as dismissing/furloughing large numbers of non-clinical workers who are already overwhelmed converting hospital beds, maintaining equipment, and performing other non-clinical but essential jobs,” they stated.
As such, they believe that the federal government should provide a 35 percent increase in Medicare reimbursement for COVID-19-related DRGs. They wrote, “Even that increase in Medicare reimbursement would not solve the broader enterprise problem of lost revenue from cancelled elective procedures. If the pandemic and correlated loss of elective cases continues into the fall of 2021, increased reimbursement would need to come from commercial payers and Medicaid as well as Medicare.”