Military's 'Joint Virtual Lifelong Electronic Record'

June 24, 2011
To help us assess how difficult it will be to link the entire nation’s electronic health records in five years, one place we can look for lessons is

To help us assess how difficult it will be to link the entire nation’s electronic health records in five years, one place we can look for lessons is the U.S. military.
The Military Health System and the Veterans Health Administration have been working for close to 10 years on making their two systems interoperable. Although they have made progress, it hasn’t been easy and some work still remains—for instance, on sharing administrative as well as clinical data.
At last week’s World Healthcare Congress in Washington, D.C., I attended a presentation by Chuck Campbell, CIO of the Military Health System, on efforts to create a “joint virtual lifelong electronic record” for members of the military.
Between MHS’ AHLTA and VA’s Vista EHRs, these two large entities keep health information on 14 million beneficiaries and record 1.7 million outpatient encounters each week. Their goal has been creating a way to seamlessly share data between the two organizations. From the outset they decided not to rip and replace any system or to develop one new system for both entities, but instead to work on ways that data can be shared, in much the same way that the National Health Information Network is envisioned.
In 2002 the work began on a federal health information exchange, which sent data on separated or retired military personnel from MHS to the VA. A few years later they created a bidirectional health information exchange, because 3.3 million people are eligible to be seen in both systems.
Now, at the click of a button on the provider’s screen, DoD clinicians can see VA data and VA clinicians can see DoD data.
“We’re sharing a tremendous amount of information between the two organizations,” Campbell said. There are about 60,000 queries a week sent between the two, he added. What’s next? Besides the formidable tasks of working on a new service-oriented architecture and introducing a customizable graphical user interface, MHS plans to team up with one of its Tricare partners on an NHIN pilot project this summer. “To connect to other federal healthcare partners and to civilian healthcare partners, we are going through the NHIN,” Campbell said. “We have participated in two demonstrations. It works. That’s where we’re headed.”
When you combine the VA, MHS and Indian Health Service, they represent a lot of patients. Will those federal organizations be able to play a major positive role in development of the NHIN? Or will their size and bureaucracy levels work against them? What do you think?


Sponsored Recommendations

ASK THE EXPERT: ServiceNow’s Erin Smithouser on what C-suite healthcare executives need to know about artificial intelligence

Generative artificial intelligence, also known as GenAI, learns from vast amounts of existing data and large language models to help healthcare organizations improve hospital ...

TEST: Ask the Expert: Is Your Patients' Understanding Putting You at Risk?

Effective health literacy in healthcare is essential for ensuring informed consent, reducing medical malpractice risks, and enhancing patient-provider communication. Unfortunately...

From Strategy to Action: The Power of Enterprise Value-Based Care

Ever wonder why your meticulously planned value-based care model hasn't moved beyond the concept stage? You're not alone! Transition from theory to practice with enterprise value...

State of the Market: Transforming Healthcare; Strategies for Building a Resilient and Adaptive Workforce

The U.S. healthcare system is facing critical challenges, including workforce shortages, high turnover, and regulatory pressures. This guide highlights the vital role of technology...